☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to World News@lemmy.mlEnglish · 7 months agoOnly 25% of US interceptors succeeded in Iran attack 😂www.jpost.comexternal-linkmessage-square3fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkOnly 25% of US interceptors succeeded in Iran attack 😂www.jpost.com☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to World News@lemmy.mlEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square3fedilink
minus-squareCluelessLemmyng@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0·7 months agoJust like Y to post a click bait, non-informative post. Here’s an article that has more info.https://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/israel-news/2280460/shockingly-inept-us-missile-defense-system-had-75-failure-rate-in-iran-attack-on-israel.html The rate is only for SM-3 missiles that targeted ballistics. Israel also had significantly fewer targets and better preparation for their interceptions.
minus-squareD61 [any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·7 months ago Only 25% of US interceptors succeeded in Iran attack - report SHOCKINGLY INEPT: US Missile Defense System Had 75% Failure Rate In Iran Attack On Israel The headlines to both articles are funny.
minus-squareRustyWizard@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·7 months agoWhaaaaat? Y posted something misleading? Do you think this person might be biased?
Just like Y to post a click bait, non-informative post. Here’s an article that has more info.https://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/israel-news/2280460/shockingly-inept-us-missile-defense-system-had-75-failure-rate-in-iran-attack-on-israel.html
The rate is only for SM-3 missiles that targeted ballistics. Israel also had significantly fewer targets and better preparation for their interceptions.
The headlines to both articles are funny.
Whaaaaat? Y posted something misleading? Do you think this person might be biased?