• HamsterRage@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’ve found the best way to reduce the threat of Russia without committing troops.

      • marmarama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The US (and the rest of NATO) is being cautious for a reason, and it’s not because they’re using Ukrainians as “meat shields.”

        NATO stocks of war materiel were at historically low levels before February 2022, and it’s difficult for the US to commit fully when China is sabre-rattling over Taiwan. That’s Xi’s (and Kim Jong-Un’s, to a lesser extent) gift to Putin. Sabre-rattling keeps the US from engaging fully in Ukraine, even though China won’t be ready to invade Taiwan for several years yet.

        Unfortunately for Ukraine, it’ll be several years before NATO materiel stocks start to grow above 2022 levels, but they will grow.

        The question is, will they grow fast enough?

        Personally I’m predicting world war in 2027-28 unless the West pulls its finger out.

        • Raphael@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I see, it is now fully justified of them to use Ukrainians as meatshields, thank you for your kind explanation.

          • marmarama@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The real meat shields in the war in Ukraine are Russian conscripts. At least Ukrainian conscripts have the conviction that they are defending their country’s internationally recognised borders.