• jobby@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 个月前

    LOL. I’m not a Russian bot. I didn’t really see the ‘Ukrainian spy chief’ part.

    • Galli [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 个月前

      here I am feeling guilty sometimes making a comment halfway through a 200 comment thread before scrolling on to find someone else already made the same joke while this mf making smug comments when they’ve not even read half the headline.

      • jobby@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 个月前

        It was late. I was tired. The guy was executed. Slow or fast, he was killed for being a political opponent, and likely tortured in the process.

        • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 个月前

          What you’re doing here is interpreting any evidence as supportive of the conclusion you choose at the beginning. You’re making that conclusion unfalsifiable.

          If Russia said he died of natural causes, you’d say they’re lying. Ukraine says the same thing, well this blood clot must be evidence of torture. Why Ukraine wouldn’t jump on that interpretation if it was at all plausible is left unanswered. If he was struck by lightning you’d say Putin used him to test a new superweapon.

          • NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 个月前

            This situation is interesting and IMO very revealing about Western media.

            1. Russia hates this guy because he’s a fascist and collaborates with the West against the ruling order.
            2. Ukraine hates this guy because he’s a Russian nationalist and supports the war and annexation of Russian-speaking Ukrainian territories.

            So what does Western media do when those interests are at odds? Across the board, they put an enormous effort into supporting him.

            What this reveals is that the interests of Ukraine are much less important to the US & its media apparatus than bludgeoning Russia. All the huffing and puffing about lives lost in Ukraine was not because they are mourning the loss of human life, but because it makes Russia look bad. This became a lot more obvious when they refuse to cover a far larger number of Gazan deaths with the same vigor.

          • jobby@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 个月前

            Yeah I did. It may have ultimately been a blood clot, but that was almost certainly the result of all the abuse he suffered.

            Putin is personally responsible for his death.

        • brainw0rms [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 个月前

          I’m curious what you think Navalny stood for, which you claim to totally support? You wouldn’t lie about that too, would you? Spoilers, he was an ultra far-right nationalist piece of human garbage.

          • jobby@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 个月前

            I recently understood that he ‘flirted’ with the rightwing many years ago, but didn’t know he still was.

            • NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 个月前

              I know you’re getting roasted in the replies, but this is absolutely what most reasonable people would assume given the media atmosphere in the west right now.

              It’s just that western media is generally an unquestioning megaphone for the desires of the US national security apparatus because they’ll lose access to information sources if they don’t.

              It’s always worth exploring information from other sources, especially when it’s about foreign affairs.

              A good strategy for this is:

              1. Pick one country opposed to the West on a given issue
              2. Pick one country that is neither allied or opposed
              3. Search “<country> top news sites”
              4. Search the topic on a few of those sites. Translate pages if necessary.

              I use an RSS feed reader, so when I find a source with English-language version of the site & an RSS feed, I add those to my geopolitics feed, tagging them by country and continent.

        • robinn_IV [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 个月前

          I totally support what the guy stood for.

          Navalny was a driving force in the annual anti-Muslim, antisemitic, anti-immigrant “Russian March” in Moscow. Its central themes are “Take Back Russia,” “Russia for Russians” and “Stop Feeding the Caucasus” — the latter a demand to end federal subsidies to poorer, less-developed, largely Muslim regions of Russia. He has a video ad calling Central Asian and Muslim peoples of the Caucasus in Russia “cockroaches that must be exterminated” while implying people should go out and shoot them.

          • jobby@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 个月前

            Interesting. I guess I, and most other people in the West just assumed he was anti-Putin and therefore good.

            • zkrzsz [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 个月前

              This is the time when you should self-reflect about how the West propaganda you into this state. Governments, media lie all the time, why should you trust them when they report about their enemy’s countries?

                • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 个月前

                  I understand how it can be frustrating for you idiots to be constantly corrected by us, but maybe if you tried learning before assuming you wouldn’t find yourselves geting dogpiled for your ignorant kneejerk support of an islamophobic white supremacist ultranationalist.

                  • NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    4 个月前

                    I’m not the one frustrated. Just in a Pavlovian sense, it seems counterproductive to clown the people willing to listen the hardest.

                • Adkml [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 个月前

                  Liberals speedrun going from telling us we dont know anything to criticizing us for being smug we were right for the 1000th time any%

                  Maybe if people would stop calling us dumb tankies who don’t know how the world works we would stop saying “told you so” everytime we were proven right, again

                  Also eat my whole ass

              • NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 个月前

                Hey, this user is reevaluating their original assumptions taking into account new information.

                That is already a far step above the typical westerner response of pluging their ears and going “nuh uh” then accusing you of being a foreign intelligence agent.

            • Adkml [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 个月前

              Huh that’s weird that’s exactly what we’ve been saying the entire time and we’ve been called every fucking name in the book by you smug dipshit liberals.

              Now take this sudden realization that you had no idea about the person until the media told you about him 6 months ago and the media intentionally propped him up as a hero despite all that and apply it to the entire war.

                • NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 个月前

                  At large, they were wrong about the military buildup at the border not being for an actual invasion.

                  Dialectical materialism is just such an effective analytical tool that those who can apply it to current events wind up at accurate conclusions far more frequently than those who can’t.

                • Adkml [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 个月前

                  Sure would be nice if there was any actual benefit to it but instead we just get called Russian bots or children who don’t understand the vast complexities of the things we keep predicting 2 years I’m advance.

            • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 个月前

              I think it’s unfair to someone this credulous, so I will let you in on the fact that they are fucking with you when they call you a Russian bot or whatever. People are just really sick of dealing with ignorant neoliberals who treat Navalny like Tank Man. The other things they said, about him being a fascist, etc., were sincere and have even been covered in overly-sympathetic sources like Atlantic.

            • Sasuke [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 个月前

              How is that spreading Russian propaganda?!?!

              wow, you can tell it’s an election year… don’t even bother, i know you and your kremlin bot army are just here to convince me not to vote for hillary again. for the record, it won’t work. i’m voting for her twice this year.

            • robinn_IV [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 个月前

              How is that spreading Russian propaganda?!

              Putin wants to undermine everything Ukraine does and everything their officials say. He wants us to think he killed Navalny in order to boost this message to opponents of Russia, and when a Ukrainian official breaks the truth here you are clinging to Putler’s fantasies. Don’t bother KGB bot, I have personally read every word Anne Applebaum has ever written and would never fall for your underhanded slavic tricks.