• Alsephina@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    “The USSR did many things right in combatting inequality but ultimately fell short, it however was one of the best attempts we’ve seen so far, maybe we should improve upon that formula instead of the ones currently leading to year over year worse inequality”. For Mao Zedong you could highlight his impressive skill in unifying such a vast country as China and remodel the national identity to one of national Pride without the underpinnings of conquest and domination which has always seemed to follow a strong national identity before.

    Oh look, pretty much exactly what us communists and scientific socialists, as opposed to utopian ones, have been saying to begin with.

    Michael Parenti - Blackshirts and Reds:

    The pure socialists’ ideological anticipations remain untainted by existing practice. They do not explain how the manifold functions of a revolutionary society would be organized, how external attack and internal sabotage would be thwarted, how bureaucracy would be avoided, scarce resources allocated, policy differences settled, priorities set, and production and distribution conducted. Instead, they offer vague statements about how the workers themselves will directly own and control the means of production and will arrive at their own solutions through creative struggle. No surprise then that the pure socialists support every revolution except the ones that succeed.

    I wouldn’t say the USSR “fell short” though. They were absolutely on the right track and vastly improved the lives of its citizens over what came before, taking the region from feudal backwaters to humanity’s first space explorers in just 30 years, and rivaling a 200 y/o superpower in the process.

    Its illegal dissolution by Gorbechev and his western allies was opposed by over 90% of the population and was a disaster that the former Soviet states still haven’t fully recovered from 33 years later.