• Neato@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s been advertised forever. If there was a case, Nintendo lawsuit-happy lawyers would have taken them down by now. It was never a secret their design shared aesthetic with Pokemon.

    • 📛Maven@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Reading the article explains that it’s not that their aesthetic is shared, it’s that some of the models are extremely similar to S/V models, beyond the likelihood of coincidence, and Nintendo plans to investigate if it’s coincidence or actual asset theft.

  • andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Do I need to play it now or never? I have a feeling this FOMO is driving some of their current engagement.

  • mrfriki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Well, Palworld developer now have $200 million more than a week ago so now they can afford lawyers as good as the Pokémon company.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      It takes weeks until they see any of that Steam money from a game they just released in early access. Though a bank might likely give them a hefty loan now for a proper defense. But let‘s not pretend Japan copyright and trademark laws are lenient or reasonable and Nintendo is basically a national treasure. If Pocketpair was based in any other country it would be different but here we really do not know how it could go.