• COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 months ago

    And despite being designed to run on potatoes with a 2G connection it somehow felt just as smooth as modern mobile browsers (at least as I remember it). It’s crazy how well it worked considering the hardware and network limitations of the time.

    • Itsamelemmy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 months ago

      Didn’t opera cache images on their server and feed you a lower res version instead of what the website had? Granted with the limited bandwidth available back then, that was fine but now I don’t think many people would want that.

      • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        7 months ago

        Exactly this. Lower resolution and added compression. You could click to view full version if needed, but this was a feature as it meant faster loading and a small fraction of the data usage.

      • privatizetwiddle@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        In Opera Mini, yes. They also had a less popular but nearly identical browser, Opera Mobile, which didn’t do the proxying and compression. I had an unlimited data plan back then, so I always used Mobile. The performance was great even without compression.

    • kratoz29@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      I remember an ex-girlfriend daily driving it on her phone for all kinds of communications, so maybe this is why she preferred it, I never wondered why, I was very happy with my Linux machine and I barely used my mobile phone at those times anyway.