Quote from the article:

“When people buy an HP printer, they consider it an investment. But HP thinks that when you buy a printer, the company is investing in you.”

  • Makeitstop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    8 months ago

    If I buy a product, and the manufacturer remotely disables that product in order to coerce me into buying their goods and services, the people responsible should be charged with fraud, destruction of property, criminal conspiracy, racketeering, and anything else that can stick. It should be treated no less severely than if they hired thugs to smash it with a crowbar.

    • GooseFinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 months ago

      Ahhh yes, but you see, on page 176 §12.4.11 of the EULA it clearly states that by using our products you’ve given us your consent to rip you off.