Bluetooth, AirDrop and such file-sharing services are crucial tools in China, where the so-called Great Firewall has resulted in one of the mostly tightly-controlled internet regimes. In recent years, anti-government protesters have often turned to AirDrop to organise and share their political demands. For instance, some activists were sharing anti-Xi Jinping posters using this tool on the Shanghai subway last October - just as the Chinese president was awaiting a historic third term as the country’s leader.

  • tallwookie@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    how? just… what?

    bluetooth has been included on basically every communication capable device manufactured in the last 15+ years, easily hundreds, probably thousands of different manufacturers.

    this is an unrealistic expectation.

    the apple thing though? easy. apple and the CCP are like besties these days.

  • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hope Apple will take a stand against this, though I expect them to comply without too much protest. They’ve already been messing with iMessage and iCloud in China by the demands of the Chinese government so I expect they’ll be complying with this too.

    How will they ever block Bluetooth, though? Disabling Apple’s special protocol can be done because they only need to pressure one single company, but Bluetooth has been built into every phone for decades. There’s no way they can hope to actually enforce these rules for an open standard like that.

    • JohannesOliver@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I doubt they will. They already added a 10 minute limit in airdrop for the “receive from everyone” setting (China first, now worldwide). From a security perspective it’s a good change but it does block the usefulness of airdrop as a tool for mass messaging.

    • derived_allegory@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Apple has repeatedly given in to Chinese government’s invasive policies, despite all their marketing on “privacy”, because China is a huge market for them. As much as I hate google for most of their practices, they have the basic decency to volunteeringly leave China when their regulations is against the company value.

      • 0x815@feddit.deOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        China is a huge market for them

        Yes, and that forget that Apple still depends on Chinese factories to assemble its iPhone devices.

  • Venus@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Literally 0 sources anywhere and literally invokes 1984

    Liberal propaganda is so fucking lazy. Y’all realize this is way closer to what 1984 was actually about right?

    • 0x815@feddit.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      @Venus You may have missed some points when reading, so here are a few quotes.

      The national internet regulator [Cyberspace Administration of China] on Tuesday launched a month-long public consultation on the proposals.

      Proposals unveiled by the Cyberspace Administration of China on Tuesday …

      Phone and app developers who want to continue operating in China will have to play by the new rules - or be culled from app stores, said a software engineer who wanted to stay anonymous.

      (Emphasis mine.)

      I agree with you in that it paves the way further to George Orwell’s 1984.

      • Venus@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just saying that someone said something is not citing a source. They taught us this in elementary school.

        • 0x815@feddit.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          The source is the Chinese government, @kleinheld provided the link, everyone can easily verify that.

          • Venus@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s really not relevant unless the user mentioned wrote the article. I’m criticizing the article for not citing sources.

    • anthoniix@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s crazy how just reporting on things factually said and done by the CCP will get you called a liberal and a US propagandist. You’ve truly lost the plot.