Email is an open system, right? Anyone can send a message to anyone… unless they are on Gmail! School Interviews uses two email servers t…

  • anlumo@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Email is a relict of a bygone era and needs to die. It’s not designed for the modern Internet, and no patching like DKIM and DMARC can fix that.

    • wahming@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do share the alternative with us, that’s universally supported and not owned by a corporation.

        • Master@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          So the article is about unwarranted 12 hour delays and your solution is to use a federated platform where delays are built into the system between server syncs? The fact that people cant see your other post yet because their local servers have not synced your post to this thread should be the first sign that this might not be a good solution to this email problem…

          • anlumo@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Email also is a federated platform that syncs. It’s just a matter of getting this working, it’s a solved problem on a conceptual level.

            For example, all mail servers come with an outbound queue for mails to retry for at least a day until the mail goes through. Lemmy simply discards the message after a single try. This is a result of being beta-level software that just hasn’t been fully finished yet.

      • anlumo@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Something in the veins of Mastodon. Still federated, but with validated peers and a better protocol. XMPP also was a front-runner for me, but unfortunately that one died over the last decade.

          • anlumo@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, email has a very lenient specification that causes compatibility issues between different implementations. In addition to that, it assumes good intentions by all parties involved (because it was created when only universities and similar entities had email services), and all workarounds for this involve optional standards (DKIM etc) that aren’t always implemented or implemented properly.

            • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              email has a very lenient specification that causes compatibility issues between different implementations.

              That is not a significant issue in the present day. I’ve run a Postfix server for over a decade and never had a compatibility problem sending or receiving email. I don’t use it much any more, because most other email servers will reject anything I send through it, but that’s a spam-filter problem, not a compatibility problem.

              Moreover, this isn’t the issue at hand. OP’s email is not being rejected because of a compatibility problem.

              In addition to that, it assumes good intentions by all parties involved

              How is that different from Mastodon? Anyone can sign up for a Mastodon account or self-host an instance. How, exactly, does Mastodon determine whether your intentions are good?

              all workarounds for this involve optional standards (DKIM etc) that aren’t always implemented or implemented properly.

              That, too, is not the issue at hand. OP’s email server has DKIM etc set up correctly, according to Google’s own tools.