She stopped responding to him, she said, even though he texted and called her hundreds of times.

Ms. Dowdall, 59, started occasionally seeing a strange new message on the display in her Mercedes, about a location-based service called “mbrace.” The second time it happened, she took a photograph and searched for the name online.

“I realized, oh my God, that’s him tracking me,” Ms. Dowdall said.

  • paultimate14@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    6 months ago

    This happens again and again and again. At every level, public and private.

    The answer is not “filter these people out of these jobs” because very often they have no prior records. Or sometimes someone gets phished. The answer is to stop enabling this in the first place.

        • stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          I was asking the commenter to clarify their statement/opinion, not the fucking article but thanks for the rude ass comment dude:

          • asbestos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            But wasn’t it obvious that by “enabling” he meant the pervasiveness of privacy invasive things and company policies? In this case specifically the inability to turn off location tracking within the car. And I get it, a thief could disable it then as well, but they had her name since she was the one paying the loan, and a thief could also remove/block the cellular connectivity module.