• Lols [they/them]@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    the system for who is required to participate has practically never been fair and equitable, jury duty is not comparable to military service, and forced labour is slavery

        • xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          So you’re just doubling down on jury duty is slavery instead of considering a nuisance perspective?

          • Lols [they/them]@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            im assuming you mean nuanced

            me not agreeing with you doesnt mean i didnt consider your perspective, and saying ‘well surely not all forced labour is slavery’ isnt nuance

            • xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              The issue is you’re confusing compulsory labour with forced labour.

              If you don’t do conscription or civil service work (the alternative option) the consequences are a fine, or jail. This is the same as eg refusing jury duty or not doing your taxes.

              Having compulsory civil duties is not new, nor is it slavery. In countries at high risk of conflict (eg Taiwan), it’s practically required for their continued short-term existence.

              I’m not even pro-conscription (for my own nation at this time), but “conscription is slavery” is so reductive, and just stops people discussing the actual pros and cons of the practice.