• wantd2B1ofthestrokes@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m not a proponent of this mindset but this seems like an obvious mischaracterization of the argument

    My biggest issues is that it seems to exist only in direct response to “doomers” as they love to say. And are maybe right to criticize, but having the whole thing just being a counter extreme doesn’t work either. And there’s lot of hand waving about technology and history and markets correcting themselves.

    But I’ve never gotten the impression that it’s just a cynical “I don’t care if AI fucks everyone as long as I make money.”

      • wantd2B1ofthestrokes@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t think it’s necessarily true that if we listen to “doomers” we get sensible policy. And it’s probably more likely we get regulatory capture.

        But there does exist a sensible middle ground.

        I actually think they are correct to bring up the potential upside as something we should consider more in the moral calculus. But the of course it’s taken to a silly extreme.