• iAmTheTot@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I mean, that’s a pretty good reason. I’m not too concerned why they do a good thing, as long as it’s done.

      • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        You might get up votes if you accompanied a controversial opinion with a reasoned argument. However, making only broad, unsubstantiated statements is a waste of bandwidth and everyone’s time.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          You might get up votes if you accompanied a controversial opinion with a reasoned argument.

          Ultimately I agree that they should include the argument, but adding a reasoned argument has very little affect on the use of the vote buttons as “agree/disagree.”

      • Jack.@lemmy.mlM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        China is also the world leader in sustainable public transportation solutions

      • thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I assume you mean that they’re not a positive for our environment, even so they’re much better for our local environment, which is still one better than petrol and diesel cars imo.

      • Skua@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        They’re a “better than ICE cars” thing. I’ll take whatever improvements I can get

      • Auzy@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Why not? This has been researched many times, and the results are consistently that it is a good thing already, and getting better, in regards to overall co2 produced

        They’re also far more efficient than fuel cell too