Subspace is the answer of course!

  • Arin@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    imo by the time we have lightspeed ships we may have faster ways to send info, imagine back 2000 years ago and we tell people we can communicate faster than the speed of sound

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah but physical objects also can’t move faster than the speed of light so in any scenario where that’s possible we’ve obviously either found a workaround or we were fundamentally wrong about some part of physics.

        Maybe we have access to wormholes and we can just send radio waves through the wormholes Stargate style.

        • orrk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          well, any going faster than light will have to utilize the bending of space-time, if it ever happens and the wormhole thing has even more problems

        • perviouslyiner@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          problem with wormholes is that you can send information into the past - so if you receive a message, does that mean you’re predetermined to subsequently send that message?

      • paradiso@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Quantum entanglement? (forgive me if dumb thought, quantum physics is magic to me)

        • MaggiWuerze@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          Quantum entanglement can’t transfer data. As soon as you try to use the connection you break it.

        • WHYAREWEALLCAPS@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          Quantum entanglement is like this - you have two sealed envelopes. In one envelope the letter A is written on a sheet of paper and the other has a sheet of paper with B written on it. No one knows who has which envelope until it is opened. All opening the envelope does is let you know what is written on the piece of paper the other person has. It transfers no data between the two points as the data was already set.

        • orrk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          doesn’t work, “reading” the entangled particles causes them to change state, thus you can’t know if it changed as part of sending a message, or just because you were reading it.

          • WHYAREWEALLCAPS@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            There is no “sending” The data was set when the particles were entangled. All you’re doing is moving a particle from point A to point B.

            • orrk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              the data is still being “sent” according to the field of information sciences.

              not that it changes anything about the physical impossibility

      • arin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Speech can’t go faster than the speed of sound, sound waves… But then comes telephone networks

        • orrk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          to be fair, it’s still both slower than the light signals that were then as are now the fastest possible form of data transfer.

          saying “but someone might invent something” doesn’t mean shit to physics, it’s why we can always with confidence say that Perpetumobile are impossible

            • orrk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              no, I don’t think I am, unless you want to make the argument that infinite free energy is just 1…n brilliant inventor(s) away

    • Cosmicomical@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      Now i’m visualizing a world where long distance communication is done with sound and you have screaming pipes across the continent