• branchial@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why though? What danger does a person that is visibly religious pose to the public?

      • Kalash@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        What danger does walking around with your dick out pose to the public?

          • Kalash@feddit.ch
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            So it makes people uncomfortable. Just like religion.

            • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              People wearing clothes at all makes some people uncomfortable. Women not covering their hair is as bad to some people as “walking with your dick out”. People (of religions I don’t believe) being forced to remove attire makes me feel VERY uncomfortable and tyrranized. I’ve always been part of the movement to push back against dress codes and uniforms in workplaces because authorities having power of “style” is unacceptable to me.

              Why do only a small number of people get a say on what everyone must do, and everyone else who feels uncomfortable or oppressed “needs to suck it up”?

              If your goal is to make the fewest people uncomfortable, you let them wear their religious attire. If your goal is to make the most people uncomfortable… dicks out. If your goal is to discriminate against classes of people you don’t like, you shouldn’t be the one making decisions.

            • branchial@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              People that feel uncomfortable because they fear for their safety around openly Muslim people are islamophobes and their comfort does not matter more than the Muslim persons right to practice their religion.

              Edit: in general enforcing a cultural nonreligious hegemony by banning any religious displays at work and in public goes against the freedom of religion. People feeling uncomfortable because their faced with something they don’t like is not a greater ill than people being free to practice their religion.

                • branchial@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I was raised christian in a majority Muslim country. I know exactly what these laws do, because I felt it myself. Hence me speaking up. The shoe being on the other foot does not suddenly make it right.

                  edit: also the laws of a country do not reflect the values of every person on earth that shares the same religion as the one which is predominant in that country. Or even of the religion itself. Thats an islamophobic red herring.

                • Flax@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Many people fear for their safety around men. Should we ban men?

                • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’m a non-Christian who has feared for my safety around atheists before.

                  But I shouldn’t have a right to demand atheists act differently so I stop being scared.

                  I don’t have the right not to be offended. Nor do I have the right to have irrational phobias honored. Neither does anyone else.

                • branchial@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Right, the comfort of people that feel uncomfortable around others simply because of their religion is of no importance, regardless of the religion they feel uncomfortable around because there is no actual threat. It “just happens” to be more prevalent around muslim people which is why I chose that example. My edit meant to clarify that.

              • Kalash@feddit.ch
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                in general enforcing a cultural nonreligious hegemony by banning any religious displays at work and in public goes against the freedom of religion.

                Freedom of religion is stupid anyway. Freedom of speak and expression already allows people to believe any fiction they want, there is no reason why a certain selection of fictional ideas need a special status.

                • branchial@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  They are given a special status by being banned though. Freedom of expression extends to being free to express your religion through clothing, these laws exempt them from this right and give them a special banned status.

                  • Kalash@feddit.ch
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    8
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    There is nothing wrong with banning dangerous ideologies and their symbols.

              • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Considering most religions are death cults, openly religious people have very different priorities than I do, and many of them do not think my life has value. Some even think I am not truly alive without belief.

                Not terribly comforting.

              • Tante Regenbogen@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                I dont believe people should wear crosses or headscarves in public sector jobs. Public sector jobs are supposed to be neutral ideologically.

                • branchial@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Why should your beliefs dictate whether another person has to choose between their religion and job? And why these two things in particular, what about Orthodox Jews, people with a bindi and so on?

                  Do you have any material reason to discriminate against people like this? Particularly since this discrimination will be felt by minorities more harshly than the rest of the populace.

          • Freeman@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            There are tens of thousands (probably hundreds of thousands over the whole world) of people who got sexually harrassed by catholic personel. I think for them and their families a cross has quite strong “predatory connotations” and makes them “fear for the savety of their (or their children)”

            • branchial@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              So we should ban all displays of religion in public and at the workplace because of the actions of vile clergymen? I agree that religious symbols can be a trigger to people who have been subjected to harrassment and assault in a religious context. But I haven’t heard these people talk about a ban on religious symbols in general.

    • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not pulling out your penis in public comes from Abrahamic religious tradition, just like crosses. We sometimes forget that our modern Western hangups come from Christianity tapering the “immodesty” of cultures like the Greek and Celtic

    • qyron@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Someone felt aggravated by your words, apparently, yet it is pure good sense, regardless the colorful choice of words.