• ImOnADiet🇵🇸 (He/Him)@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Our Focus: The National Interest is an award-winning online publication focusing on defense issues, national security, military affairs and hardware, foreign policy, and U.S. politics.

    The National Interest was founded in 1985.

    Transparency Statement:

    The National Interest is owned and operated by the Center for the National Interest, founded in 1994 by U.S. President Richard M. Nixon.

    You cant be serious lmao

    Detailed Report

    Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER

    Factual Reporting: HIGH

    Country: USA

    Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE

    Media Type: Magazine

    Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic

    MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

    https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/national-interest/

    • athos77@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago
      1. That review is for news articles. If you look at the URL, it very clearly includes “blog”, so this is an opinion piece, which I take with the same amount of consideration as Letters To The Editor.

      2. Richard Nixon? You can’t expect us to trust anything associated with a ratfucker.

      • ImOnADiet🇵🇸 (He/Him)@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Uh… yes. It’s an opinion piece. You can disagree with the analysis from an opinion piece, but I linked mediabias checker to show it’s not just some random blog with no credibility that would just post an “AI Russian propaganda article”

        (Also quiz for the class: who founded the EPA lmao)

        • Ooops@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can disagree with the analysis from an opinion piece

          That would require an actual analyses existing instead of just a strong opinion with no evidence.

          • ImOnADiet🇵🇸 (He/Him)@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Did we read the same article? It’s not super deep analysis (what do you expect from libertarians) but he’s backing up his claims with actual reporting if you follow the hyper links.

            • NoiseColor@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Did you read the title of this article? Brilliantly loaded with two Russian taking points : US being the reason for the war and that Ukraine cannot win and should not even fight. No one that cares about credibility would write that.