8GB RAM in M3 MacBook Pro Proves the Bottleneck in Real-World Tests::Apple’s new MacBook Pro models are powered by cutting-edge M3 Apple silicon, but the base configuration 14-inch model starting at $1,599…

    • Iwasondigg@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t they also solder it to the motherboard so you can’t upgrade your RAM as well?

      • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        51
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not so much soldered to the motherboard as much as part of the same package as the CPU. As in: there are no separate memory chips.

        • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          But they did indeed solder it in before that, on their old Intel laptops. I think they started doing that in 2013 or 2014 but I forget exactly.

          • 4am@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That has more to do with faster traces; the ram is “closer” to the CPU so the signal is cleaner.

            Not defending the move, I’d take upgradability in a laptop.

            • TwanHE@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Only makes a difference at oc levels of manual tuning. Which apple isn’t doing at their factory I reckon.

              • 4am@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I mean, when you’re the one manufacturing the board, I’m pretty sure you could eek out some more baseline performance without having to tweak each one for OC in the production line, my dude.

                • TwanHE@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  At 100gb/s for the base model there probably actively downclocking the ram to make the higher end models more attractive.

        • Billiam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So wait- if you want to increase your RAM, you have to install a whole new CPU?

      • Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lol, the ram is part of the m3 chip That’s a reason why it is so efficient. The storage in m3 is for RAM and videoRAM.

        Wikipedia: The M3’s Unified Memory Architecture features up to 24 GB RAM, the M3 Pro up to 36 GB, and the M3 Max up to 128 GB. Like the M2 generation, the M3 SoCs use 6,400 MT/s LPDDR5 SDRAM. As with prior M series SoCs, this serves as both RAM and video RAM.

        • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s literally how Intel integrated GPUs work too

          The RAM being shared with the GPU, that is.

          • Petter1@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yea but the RAM is not on the located within the chip design, is it?

          • DarienGS@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            With Apple’s chips the RAM is all on the CPU die so both CPU and GPU get the performance benefit. With Intel’s, none of it is.

            • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              "What Apple calls “unified memory” is RAM (random-access memory) used as “main memory” (not a CPU or GPU cache and not mass storage either).

              The term “unified” refers to the fact that the memory is shared by the CPU cores and the GPU cores. That’s not novel: “integrated graphics” options in Intel x86 chips (like Iris Xe) do the same, as do just about all modern smartphones."

              • DarienGS@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m not talking about the merits or otherwise of “unified memory”, I’m pointing out that because Apple’s RAM is physically integrated into the CPU, it can provide more memory bandwidth than regular DDR5 DIMMs.

      • Sendbeer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well yeah, if you were paying $50 a GB wouldn’t you too? Got to lock that shit down!

    • xkforce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      How the fuck did Apple manage to be the largest company on the planet doing shit like this? Are Apple users really that fucking dumb?

        • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          And they’re much better at marketing than they are at making computers or phones. Apple is probably the most successful marketing company in the world.

        • tabular@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not sure “friendly” is quite the right word… you can argue it’s well designed or cultivated users but Apple is anything but a "friend"ly.

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Their UI and UX is shit. You basically can’t use it for many basic tasks without installing a bunch of third party (proprietary and expensive) software.