[A]n INI configuration file in the Windows Canary channel, discovered by German website Deskmodder, includes references to a “Subscription Edition,” “Subscription Type,” and a “subscription status.”

  • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d switch at that point. I’ve only not switched because the pain isn’t worth the reward right now. I’d have to learn a bunch of new apps and hasn’t been worth it.

    Start charging a subscription fee. I’ll learn to use whatever tools a priority.

    • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Trust me, it’s already worth it. Literally every other operating system in existence is better than windows. I’d use Temple OS before going back.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        1 year ago

        Caveat: if the software you need is supported. Unfortunately that’s the major reason I haven’t switched

      • H2207@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        And a lot of linux programs take inspiration from Microsoft’s design because they’re the norm. When you think of a word processor you think of Word, same goes for all of Office 365 actually.

        • GONADS125@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I think of Word 2007. All downhill after that…

          Edit: Or was it 2011? I can’t even remember anymore…

          • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            They implemented the ribbon menu in ~2007 office iirc, somewhen around Vista. 2003 is the old WinXP styled one with all these little menus and buttons, fugly but usable. Is that the one you’ve meant?

            • GONADS125@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              No I think it was 2011. Whatever the stable most streamlined release was before Office 365 rolled out.

            • ourob@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m having to use windows+office for work after a few years of being linux only, and god do I hate modern office’s interface.

              The ribbon, on its own, isn’t super offensive to me - its just a chonky toolbar. But why on earth did they have to get rid of the classic menus?! If I don’t know where a feature is, it’s so much easier to skim through text menus than flipping from ribbon to ribbon, hovering over each button for tooltips, and popping out secondary toolbars of icons to find what I want. It’s maddening for someone who only needs to use office intermittently.

        • Solivine@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think of Google Docs now because the inconvenience of not being able to have word on my own system without a price caused me to use the free alternative.

        • Riskable@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          When you think of a word processor you think of Word.

          Only if you’re a cretin! The only thing one should envision when thinking of a word processor is WordPerfect 1.21a for the Apple IIgs!

          Envisioning Calligra Words is also acceptable.

      • Nelots@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Remove the bloatware with a free program like ShutUp10++, and Windows is a fine OS. Linux may very well be better still, but better enough to go through the effort of switching over, reinstalling everything, relearning everything, finding alternatives to programs, etc.? I doubt it. Not for me at least.

    • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Start trying some of the open source apps on Windows. For example, try using LibreOffice for a bit and see how it compares to Microsoft Office. You may be surprised to find that the difference isn’t as big as you thought.

      • psychothumbs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        LibreOffice works at least as well as Word on its own terms, the problem is how Microsoft deliberately breaks interoperability so you can’t reliably share the documents you create on Libre with people who are going to open them with Word.

        • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Absolutely. Works great for printing or converting to pdf, though. I just export them to docx anyway and see what happens.

        • Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Don’t they both use the open format now? .odt? I haven’t needed to use an office suite for a while, but I would have thought that it would force compatibility.

      • Blaster M@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wish. Try editing a document with tables.

        LibreOffice is fine if all you are doing is writing a Dear Princess Celestia letter, but when you actually start doing advanced things, the jankiness of LibreOffice starts to become wasted effort. If I have to spend more time fighting the program than actually doing work, it’s worth the money for Office. Especially at $70/year for M365, which is roughly 1-3 hours of work depending on what job and such.

      • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Since most companies are moving their tools to web-based versions, the switch will be even easier.

        Office already has extensive een versions. They’re not entirely there yet, but good enough if you don’t need advanced functionality.

      • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Like garbage. That’s why I haven’t invested in the time. I write large documents and do lot of research for publishing. As such learning a new tool is a pain in the ass

        • mbp@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It does the same job but when you’re using it constantly the small QOL things really matter.

          • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Exactly. It’s taking the time to learn everything to produce a document quickly for publishing.

            Even going from pc to Mac word requires an uplift.

            I figure when I make the switch, it’ll cost me about 100k in lost productivity. Nothing has driven me to take that loss yet but a subscription might.

            • mbp@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Favorite OS be damned when you have a fiscal consequence. Switching to Linux full time will cost me money at the end of it and I can’t justify that until it costs me more to NOT switch to Linux.

      • idefix@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unfortunately the difference is huge. It’s not just the cost of learning a new tool, it’s that 10% of really important features are not there. For me for example it was the ability to apply a theme to an existing presentation in Impress. Well in the corporate world, it’s mandatory.

        Using Linux daily since 99, as my only personal OS since 2013, and still struggling with the office alternatives.

    • isles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I started using a lot of the same open-source tools that are on Linux as replacements in Windows to ease the transition. As someone else mentioned, most of the top projects strive to match the workflows of traditional Windows options. Some lemmy instances have huge posts of top tier open source alternatives to most things you need and somethings you don’t.