Nothing interesting to put here

  • 2 Posts
  • 49 Comments
Joined 6 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 12th, 2024

help-circle
  • How is “Unix philosophy” even remotely connected to the philosophy behind free software? Unix itself was proprietary. These are completely separate things.

    “Stay on windows or mac”

    And what if I don’t? I have the freedom to use Linux however I want, and with whatever display server I want, granted to me by GPLv2.

    “What you’re doing is defending corporate funded software”

    Do you even realize just how much funding and support Linux kernel itself receives from various multi-billion corporations? If that’s a bad thing in your book, I suggest you look into BSD, but even that gets a bit of funding from them.

    “designed with malicious intent”

    You have yet to provide an proof for that. What’s their malicious intent exactly? Just creating an FLOSS modern alternative that people are free to use or avoid?


  • TxzK@lemmy.ziptolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldwayland was a mistake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    26 days ago

    How exactly is this a meme? This is just bitching about stuff. And no Wayland isn’t a mistake. Maybe it is to you luddites who can’t move on from your Unix religion, but for the majority, Wayland brings tons of new features and improvements over X11. I mean X11 still has it’s uses, but it doesn’t mean Wayland just shouldn’t exist. Still if you wanna bitch about it go on. You are free to do so like distros are free to move away from X11. But at least don’t do it in a meme community.










  • I am not defending rape and pedophilia. They are wrong, there’s no denying that. I am not denying that. I am just saying not everyone that follows those religions are rapists or pedophiles. The distinction is encourage would mean people have certain obligation to do it. You you follow this religion, you must rape. While permit, is bad as well, but you do not have the obligation and can choose not to. And many not only does, but often doesn’t even know that it’s permitted in the first place as they’re moral is shaped also by the modern outlook of things, at least to certain extent. On the hindsight, yeah it does look like I am trying to defend pedophiles and rapists, but I am not. Any religion that permits them is bad. But just a little less bad than “you should rape them”. In a perfect world, no one would follow these shitty religions, but unfortunately it’s not a perfect world.


  • Well you coming from Islam doesn’t make you not being able to adopt another religion later. Also I’ve seen many idiots larping as muslims online, so yeah. Anyway, whatever. I’d suggest stop trying to direct criticism to selective religions and criticise unethical actions themselves instead. There are like 5 gazillion religions in India, you can’t just blame any particular religion for some random rapes. Not all follow their religion equally either. Some dipshits more than willing to rape people if theirs allow it, some simply assume it’s not allowed in the first place. Accusing all followers of a particular religion for some of it’s followers crime is disgusting generalisation.


  • I am pretty sure they’re used as brackets not quotes. Quran is quite ambiguous sometimes, so maybe it was used for clarifying, I am not sure. I don’t read Arabic. May be it did allow marital rape (honestly wouldn’t be surprised), but my point still stands that it doesn’t allow all forms of rape, like you are implying. And again, permitted != encouraged. The point also stands for Hinduism. Yes, it apparently allows wife beating and marital rape and (I stand corrected, thanks for that I guess), but still it doesn’t allow you to go out and rape anyone you see on the street. Let me be clear, I am not defending them for allowing these. I am just pissed at your implications that this two and only this two allows all kinds of rape while others doesn’t. Many things true about Islam is also true about Christianity as well. You ain’t complaining about that? I wonder why? Maybe because you’re trying to make other religions look bad while undermining the atrocities of your religion? If you were a atheist too you’d have criticised it as well surely. And that’s the thing me angry, hypocrites trying to make other religions look bad while often following an equally shitty one.



  • “stfu what kind of atheist exmuslim you are”

    I am the kind of exmuslim atheist that sees all religion equally, and tolerates faith as long as it isn’t used to justify racism/sexism/homophobia or any other kinds of bigotry and hates hypocrites who cry “my religion good other religion bad”

    The first link says marital rape is allowed on the basis of Q2:223. But from https://quran.com/al-baqarah/223

    “Your wives are like farmland for you, so approach them consensually as you please. And send forth something good for yourselves. Be mindful of Allah, and know that you will meet Him. And give good news to the believers.”

    Keyword: consensually: With permission. Without resistance.

    And yes, it did allow pedophilia (which is rape yes, since children can’t consent) and raping war captives, as I said it did lot of bullshit, I am not defending it. But it didn’t allow just going out raping everyone as you implied. And also permitted != encouraged.

    And what’s your evidence for claiming Hinduism allowing rape? It doesn’t as far as I know. You didn’t even bother providing any source for it.