• AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Polish President Andrzej Duda said Poland is “ready” to host nuclear weapons on its territory if NATO decides to reinforce its eastern flank.

    Recently, it has been relocating its nuclear weapons to Belarus,” Duda said in an interview published Monday by Polish outlet Fakt.

    Since the beginning of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, President Vladimir Putin has made veiled nuclear threats toward the West, even stashing atomic weapons in Belarus, which borders NATO members Poland, Lithuania and Latvia.

    Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov responded Monday that Russia “will take all the necessary retaliatory steps to guarantee our security,” according to state-owned news service RIA Novosti.

    Duda, who recently traveled to New York and met Republican 2024 candidate Donald Trump, spoke fondly of the former president, saying that the two have “a lot of common topics."

    I really like talking to him, because he is an extremely interesting personality and has a lot of experience, both political and business.”


    The original article contains 283 words, the summary contains 156 words. Saved 45%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    While I can understand Poland’s desire to have nuclear weapons available, this seems like it would be a really provocative step towards Russia. Nuclear weapons positioned that close to Russia will raise the threat of a nuclear first strike against Russia. Even without an unstable strongman in charge of Russia, it’s easy to see how a Russian government would be uncomfortable with this. At the same time, with an unstable strongman in charge of Russia, the provocation may not matter. Putin has proven he is willing to invade his neighbor and slaughter thousands, without provocation. So, I’m sure Poland isn’t as worried about provocation as they are defense.

  • bigpEE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Cool, let’s let them. Poland’s a strong ally in Europe. I don’t see a downside

        • AEsheron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          This isn’t the same. Host nukes is not owning nukes, they seems to be proposing housing US nukes that Poland would not have control of, or be able to launch. With no launch codes, they aren’t a valid deterrent to conventional war, unless the world is convinced the US would use them to protect Polish sovereignty, which would obviously not be on the table.

    • Omniraptor@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      it’s a mirror of “Cuba is a strong ally in the West, let’s let them have nukes. What could go wrong”

      • bigpEE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Nothing did go wrong, though. If you’re saying there was a close call, that’s true, but Russia doesn’t have the ability to threaten a conventional response. And no one gets nuked for moving nukes around; look at Belarus.

    • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The problem with the world is that good people are conflicted while evil people are confident.

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Unnecessary, there is nothing Poland can offer that isn’t already guaranteed by an Ohio class submarine

  • Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    We already had the Cuban missile crisis before, we don’t need this shit again. This time it might go differently.